Evidence of Neocolonialism in African Trade Relations Essay

Athow Brian and Robert G. Blanton open their study of African mickle relations beforehand and after European colonialism in colonial ardor and colonial Legacies Trade Patterns in British and french Africa. This study is quite important as it is an grounds to scientifically assess the colonial trade bequest in a comparative manner. In fact, it is the whole research of its kind analyzing trade relations of antecedently colonise states of Africa amongst 1938 and 1985. The authors goal is to discover whether neocolonialism overlays to guide up in the previously colonized African states with regard to trade relations.In other words, do the previously colonized African states continue to depend on the colonialists for trade? The underdevelopment of Africa is attributable to many factors, including the fact that it takes economically powerful governments with a strong sense of their goals to appoint their muckle and develop nations. It is a well-known fact that the Eur opean colonialists had their own interests at heart. Their mercenary objectives could non accommodate the goal of developing Africa. African states that came to be ruled by Europeans were agonistic to produce agrarian goods as well as raw materials to get European demands alone.The traditional agricultural economies of the colonized states of Africa were forced by french and British colonialists to start specializing in cash crops that were solely meant for export. Although the French and British colonialists came to h senescent significant political power over the African people, the local needs of the latter were utterly disregarded. No wonder, although Africa continues to appear lush green to the human eye, its people suffer from severe hunger. After all, their needs admit been disregarded even after emancipation was achieve from the European colonialists.As a matter of fact, the authors of Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies found that the African states that were previou sly colonized by the French continue to allow France as their chief trading partner. Similarly, African states that were previously colonized by the British continue to trade with the British in addition to other states that had been colonized by the British. What is more, the trading style of the colonialists continues to be employ by the African states that were colonized by the French and the British. French colonies of Africa were under a centralized rule.For this causa, they continue to consider France as their chief trading partner. British rule was decentralized to a large extent. Moreover, the British had already established trade relations between the African colonized states and other nations across the public that had been colonized by the British. These trading patterns continue to this day, which is the reason why the authors of Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies link up to neocolonialism in African trade relations. According to the authors, old habits die hard.A frica continues to suffer from severe poverty because its resources do not support the Africans. Rather, previously colonized African states continue to produce for the French and the British peoples. Africans are dependent on the moneys they receive for the goods they export to France and Britain, in addition to previously colonized British states in other parts of the world. Seeing that Africa appears to be on the losing side of this deal, the article, Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies calls for long structural changes in the political and trade patterns use in Africa today.It would take African governments to develop a strong sense of their goals to achieve economic independence for the Africans this time having the interests of their own people at heart.BibliographyBrian, Athow, and Robert G. Blanton. Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies Trade Patterns in British and French Africa. Journal of Third World Studies (Fall 2002). forthcoming from http//findarticles. com/p/art icles/mi_qa3821/is_200210/ai_n9134671. Internet accessed 27 November 2008.